This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 8, 2022. It is now read-only.
Update README with new SBT instructions #53
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
|
||
| ### Historical Note | ||
|
|
||
| These instructions are valid as of Partest 1.0.13. Prior to that release, SBT users required `sbt-partest-interface` in addition to `scala-partest`. The test framework class used to be `scala.tools.partest.Framework`, whereas now it is `scala.tools.partest.sbt.Framework`) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That should be scala-partest-interface instead of sbt-partest-interface
|
Otherwise LGTM |
SethTisue
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2016
Update README with new SBT instructions
lrytz
pushed a commit
to lrytz/scala-partest
that referenced
this pull request
May 9, 2018
Update README with new SBT instructions
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Review by @szeiger